With this（）mind, we are writing to inquire if we could now begin discussing the question of sole agency.
第1题：
What can we conclude from the text?
A Most people believe we think in symbols.
B Loving our own writing is scientifically reasonable.
C The writers and critics can never reach an agreement.
D Thinking and writing are different stages of mind at work.
第2题：
A、According to me
B、In my opinion
C、Thanks.to my mind
第3题：
The purpose of the author in writing this passage is
A． that, by banning the violent sports, we human beings can improve ourselves
B． that, by banning the dangerous sports, we can improve the law
C． that we must take positive steps to improve social welfare system
D． to show law is the main instrument of social change
第4题：
Field is related to how we communicate, through speech or writing.()
第5题：
We can know that before 1995 Mary 。
A. had two books published
B. received many career awards
C. knew how to use a computer
D. supported the JDRF by writing
第6题：
A.Certainly
B.By all means
C.Yes, please
D.No, of course not
第7题：
our writing in the g time. After that, we have to check our 79.
第8题：
D
It is true that good writers rewrite and rewrite and then rewrite some more. But in order to work up the desire to rewrite, it is important to learn to like what you write at the early stage.
I am surprised at the number of famous writers I know who say that they so dislike reading their own writing later that they even hate to look over the publishers’ opinions. One reason we may dislike reading our own work is that we’re often disappointed that the rich ideas in our minds seem very thin and plain when first written down. Jerry Fodor and Steven Pinker suggest that this fact may be a result of how our minds work. .
Different from popular belief ,we do not usually think in the works and sentences of ordinary language but in symbols for ideas （known as “mentalese”）, and writing our ideas down is an act of translation from that symbolic language . But while mentalese contains our thoughts in the form. of a complex tapestry （织锦），writing can only be composed one thread at a time . Therefore it should not be surprising that our first attempt at expressing ideas should look so simple. It is only by repeatedly rewriting that we produces new threads and connect them to get closer to the ideas formed in our minds.
When people write as if some strict critics （批评家） are looking over their shoulder , they are so worried about what this critic might say that they get stuck before they even start. Peter Elbow makes an excellent suggestion to deal with this problem. When writing we should have two different minds. At the first stage, we should see every idea, as well as the words we use to express it ,as wonderful and worth putting down . It is only during rewrites that we should examine what we excitedly wrote in the first stage and check for weaknesses.
68. What do we learn from the text about those famous writers?
A They often regret writing poor works
B Some of them write surprisingly much.
C Many of them hate reading their own works
D They are happy to review the publishers’ opinions.
第9题：
What can we conclude from the text?
A． Most people believe wen think in sysbols.
B． Loving our own writing is scientifically reasonable .
C． The writers and crities can never reach an agreement.
D． Thinking and writing are different stages of mind at work.
第10题：
A.publish
B.establish
C.protect
D.lavish