单选题Which of the following is true according to the fourth paragraph?A More and more Japanese cars are sold in Detroit recently.B Domestic cars still hold the bigger market share in America.C Chrysler’s market share has never been surpassed by Toyota.D Kor

题目
单选题
Which of the following is true according to the fourth paragraph?
A

More and more Japanese cars are sold in Detroit recently.

B

Domestic cars still hold the bigger market share in America.

C

Chrysler’s market share has never been surpassed by Toyota.

D

Korean cars are less popular than Japanese cars in America.

如果没有搜索结果或未解决您的问题,请直接 联系老师 获取答案。
相似问题和答案

第1题:

What will happen if a draft is stamped "accepted" by a bank?

A.The bank will sell it as soon as possible to the buyer.

B.The draft will become money market funds.

C.Dealers will buy it in the domestic market.

D.The draft becomes a banker's acceptance and will be sold in the money market.


正确答案:D
解析:最后一句指出Alternatively, the bank can stamp the draft "accepted" with the appropriate signature,...sell it in the secondary market, 意思是作为一种选择,由银行承兑的汇票可以在二级市场上流通(这是因为银行信誉度高的缘故)。

第2题:

阅读短文,判断句子正误,正确的写T,错误的写F 。

In recent years, the Chinese auto industry has seen rapid growth, with the demand on private cars rising sharply in Chinese cities since 2002.

By 2009, China has replaced the U.S. to become the world's largest auto market. As an important part of the world car industry, the global auto industry will shift further to China. This brings historical opportunity to China's auto market.

Currently, both the development of China's auto market and the changes in consumer demand for vehicles are ever -increasing. China's auto industry will continue to grow in the next decade. It means there is still huge room for its development. China has an urban population of more than 600million. It also has a huge agricultural vehicle market in the rural areas. Hence, there is no doubt for China's development of auto industry. That is also the reason why the world's auto producers are paying more attention to the Chinese market.

()26. The demand on private cars increased greatly in Chinese cities since 2002.

()27. China has become the world's largest auto market.

()28. China's auto industry tends to decrease in the next decade.

()29. China has an urban population of less than 600 million.

()30. The reason why the world's auto producers are paying more attention to the Chinese market is that China's auto industry developed very quickly.


参考答案:26-30:T T F F F


第3题:

– Then what do you think of the opportunities? – ________ , if we come up with some new products for young people, we’ll have a bigger market share.

A、According to me

B、In my opinion

C、Thanks.to my mind


参考答案:B

第4题:

资料:“Our cars are for people who want something different.”
This has been the slogan for over 50 years of Suprema Cars, a manufacturer of an English sports car. The car is mostly handmade in the company's factory in northern England. Suprema Car produces approximately 500 cars a year. About 5 years ago, the company began to lose sales and market share, and in the last two years, it has made a loss.
Recently, there have been problems with the labor force. The factory workers have demand higher wages and better working conditions. They are also unhappy because the management is insisting that they increase production, but the workers think this will have a bad effect on the quality of the cars.
The company still has many loyal customers. People buy Suprema sports cars because they are handmade and have an image of quality and craftsmanship.

What kind services does Suprema Cars provide?

A.It designs classic car models.
B.It produces hand-made cars.
C.It research and develop car-related technologies.
D.It creates advertisements for the cars.

答案:B
解析:
本题的问题是“Suprema汽车提供什么样的服务?”。选项A意为“它设计经典的汽车模型”;选项B意为“它生产手工制造的汽车”;选项C意为“它研究和开发汽车相关技术”;选项D意为“它为汽车制作广告”。根据主题句可知,Suprema汽车生产手工制造的车,故选B。

第5题:

资料:Google and Uber have grabbed most of the attention regarding the advent of self-driving cars, but on Sunday, Lyft threw down the ultimate challenge: A majority of autonomous vehicles for Lyft within a mere five years.
   The bold claim was made by Lyft co-founder John Zimmer in a post on Medium outlining his company's vision for the next decade.
  "Within five years a fully autonomous fleet of cars will provide the majority of Lyft rides across the country," said Zimmer, indicating that early versions of such cars have been in operation in San Francisco and Phoenix.
  Usually when tech founders lay out their vision, it’s typical to hear grand claims that almost push the boundaries of believability. That's what tech innovation is about. But in the case of self-driving cars, the situation is a bit more complicated.
  Uber has already begun rolling out self-driving car tests in Pittsburgh and Google is hard at work on the same kind of solution on the West Coast. Therefore, talk of getting self-driving cars on the road is, at this point, less about the technology and more about logistics. We know Google has enough cash to triple down on any initiative it decides to tackle. And as the current ride-sharing leader in the U.S., Uber has enough market share-powered credibility that a future including self-driving Uber cars isn't unrealistic.
  Today there are some internet-based ride sharing system but to overcome the critical mass the system has to be real-time, automated and extremely easy to use.
  However in the case of Lyft, which continues to struggle against Uber (one report claims that Uber has over 80 percent market share in the U.S.), such a short timeline toward rolling out a fleet of self-driving cars seems somewhat ambitious. Nevertheless, Zimmer continues his vision essay with even more bold predictions.
  "By 2025, private car ownership will all but end in major U.S. cities," says Zimmer, a prediction that, if it turns out to be true, would mean it would take just eight years for the majority of the human-driven cars on U.S. roads to disappear. Possible? Sure. Likely? Eight years seems like, once again, a bit of wishful thinking on Zimmer's part.
  Remember, it hasn't even been 10 years since the arrival of the iPhone, and as recent events prove, smartphones are still a category that can yield catastrophic results if not done right. And those are just mobile devices, not vehicles entrusted with transporting and protecting human lives.
  To be fair, Zimmer's essay does offer some facts and figures in an attempt to back up his positions, but much of it doesn't appear to take into account variables such as the heavily embedded interests of automobile companies still relying on consumer auto sales, as well as the many legal and roadway logistics that will need to be addressed in order to bring about this massive transformation in such a short time.
  Oddly, Zimmer's vision does little to address the millions of human jobs that will be lost once self-driving cars displace not only taxi drivers, but truck drivers.
  "We believe that in the first five or more years following the introduction of autonomous vehicles, the need for human drivers will actually increase, not decrease," writes Zimmer. "When autonomous cars can only solve a portion of those trips, more Lyft drivers will be needed to provide service to the growing market of former car owners," writes Zimmer.
  But what about after five years, when autonomous cars can provide full service? What about the human drivers? The pushback from human drivers losing work will likely be another, major ripple in the evolution of self-driving cars, as well as other automated systems entering U.S. society in coming years.
  However, none of these logistical issues diminish Zimmer's ideas. His vision of the future of autonomous vehicles seems quite logical and in step with most who work in and watch the space closely. But the speed bump in accepting his vision wholesale is his ambitious self-driving car timeline in general, and for Lyft in particular.
 

A.We need to reach everyone’s potential to realize self-driving cars
B.There are still many problems to be solved in self-driving cars
C.Lyft co-founder says most of its cars will be autonomous in 5 years
D.The advantages and disadvantages of self-driving cars

答案:C
解析:
本题考查主旨大意。
【关键词】best title of the passage
【主题句】but on Sunday Lyft threw down the ultimate challenge: A majority of autonomous vehicles for Lyft within a mere five years. 但是在周六,叫车应用“来福”(Lyft)抛出了终极挑战:在仅仅五年后,大部分来福车将是自动驾驶车辆。
【解析】题目意为“文章最好的题目是?”选项A意为“我们需要开发每个人的潜力来实现自动驾驶汽车”,选项B意为“实现自动驾驶汽车还有很多问题需要解决”,选项C意为“Lyft联合创始人说大部分汽车将在五年内实现自动驾驶”,选项D意为“自动驾驶汽车的优缺点”,本篇文章文体是社会新闻类,此类文体往往在开篇抛出新闻事件,同时也是全文的核心内容,因此答案C正确。

第6题:

To gain more market share, Luckin Coffee added tea drinks to attract tea lovers and vending machines to sell coffee more conveniently.()

此题为判断题(对,错)。


参考答案:错

第7题:

Which of the following statements is NOT true?( )

[A] Sales of contemporary art fell dramatically from 2007 to 2008.

[B] The art market surpassed many other industries in momentum.

[C] The art market generally went downward in various ways.

[D] Some art dealers were awaiting better chances to come.


正确答案:B
下列哪一项表述是不正确的?
[A]从2007年到2008年当代艺术品的销售急剧下滑。
[B]艺术品市场在势头上超过了很多其他行业。
[C]在整体上艺术品市场在很多方面下滑了。
[D]一些艺术品交易者在等待更好时机的到来。
答案解析:[B]事实细节题。文章第二段第一句提到了“momentum”,意为“势头”,即“世界艺术品市场已经有一段时间失去了它的发展势头”。本段最后一句提到“但是这个市场产生的利益远远超出它本身的规模,因为它可以把巨大的财富、膨胀的自我、贪婪、激情和争议以某种方式结合在一起,其他行业很少能与之媲美。”在这里,作者比较的是艺术品市场和其他行业在“把财富、自我、贪婪、激情和争议结合在一起”的方式方面,而不是发展的势头,[B]的论述张冠李戴,是错误的,故为答案。由文章第三段第三句可知[A]是正确的,[C]是全文的主题,有很多数据可以证明,而[D]在全文最后一段的最后一句可以找到明确表述,这三项都是正确的,故均排除。

第8题:

Which of the following statements about a money market is NOT true according to this passage?

A.Money market does not exist in planned economies.

B.Money market has been established in some socialist countries.

C.Money market encourages open competition among bulk suppliers of funds.

D.Money market relies upon market processes to distribute funds to final users.


正确答案:A
解析:根据第二段第一句我们可以知道,货币市场也存在于计划经济中,所以A项的表述是错误的。

第9题:

资料:“Our cars are for people who want something different.”
This has been the slogan for over 50 years of Suprema Cars, a manufacturer of an English sports car. The car is mostly handmade in the company's factory in northern England. Suprema Car produces approximately 500 cars a year. About 5 years ago, the company began to lose sales and market share, and in the last two years, it has made a loss.
Recently, there have been problems with the labor force. The factory workers have demand higher wages and better working conditions. They are also unhappy because the management is insisting that they increase production, but the workers think this will have a bad effect on the quality of the cars.
The company still has many loyal customers. People buy Suprema sports cars because they are handmade and have an image of quality and craftsmanship.

Which of the following is NOT a problem that Suprema Cars is facing?

A.Customers’ distrust of products.
B.A financial loss.
C.Unhappy workers.
D.Loss on sales and market share.

答案:A
解析:
本题的问题是“以下哪一项不是Suprema汽车面临的问题?”。选项A意为“客户对产品的不信任”;选项B意为“经济损失”;选项C意为“不快乐的工人”;选项D意为“失去销售和市场份额”。根据主题句可知,B、C、D选项均有提及,故选A。

第10题:

资料:Google and Uber have grabbed most of the attention regarding the advent of self-driving cars, but on Sunday, Lyft threw down the ultimate challenge: A majority of autonomous vehicles for Lyft within a mere five years.
   The bold claim was made by Lyft co-founder John Zimmer in a post on Medium outlining his company's vision for the next decade.
  "Within five years a fully autonomous fleet of cars will provide the majority of Lyft rides across the country," said Zimmer, indicating that early versions of such cars have been in operation in San Francisco and Phoenix.
  Usually when tech founders lay out their vision, it’s typical to hear grand claims that almost push the boundaries of believability. That's what tech innovation is about. But in the case of self-driving cars, the situation is a bit more complicated.
  Uber has already begun rolling out self-driving car tests in Pittsburgh and Google is hard at work on the same kind of solution on the West Coast. Therefore, talk of getting self-driving cars on the road is, at this point, less about the technology and more about logistics. We know Google has enough cash to triple down on any initiative it decides to tackle. And as the current ride-sharing leader in the U.S., Uber has enough market share-powered credibility that a future including self-driving Uber cars isn't unrealistic.
  Today there are some internet-based ride sharing system but to overcome the critical mass the system has to be real-time, automated and extremely easy to use.
  However in the case of Lyft, which continues to struggle against Uber (one report claims that Uber has over 80 percent market share in the U.S.), such a short timeline toward rolling out a fleet of self-driving cars seems somewhat ambitious. Nevertheless, Zimmer continues his vision essay with even more bold predictions.
  "By 2025, private car ownership will all but end in major U.S. cities," says Zimmer, a prediction that, if it turns out to be true, would mean it would take just eight years for the majority of the human-driven cars on U.S. roads to disappear. Possible? Sure. Likely? Eight years seems like, once again, a bit of wishful thinking on Zimmer's part.
  Remember, it hasn't even been 10 years since the arrival of the iPhone, and as recent events prove, smartphones are still a category that can yield catastrophic results if not done right. And those are just mobile devices, not vehicles entrusted with transporting and protecting human lives.
  To be fair, Zimmer's essay does offer some facts and figures in an attempt to back up his positions, but much of it doesn't appear to take into account variables such as the heavily embedded interests of automobile companies still relying on consumer auto sales, as well as the many legal and roadway logistics that will need to be addressed in order to bring about this massive transformation in such a short time.
  Oddly, Zimmer's vision does little to address the millions of human jobs that will be lost once self-driving cars displace not only taxi drivers, but truck drivers.
  "We believe that in the first five or more years following the introduction of autonomous vehicles, the need for human drivers will actually increase, not decrease," writes Zimmer. "When autonomous cars can only solve a portion of those trips, more Lyft drivers will be needed to provide service to the growing market of former car owners," writes Zimmer.
  But what about after five years, when autonomous cars can provide full service? What about the human drivers? The pushback from human drivers losing work will likely be another, major ripple in the evolution of self-driving cars, as well as other automated systems entering U.S. society in coming years.
  However, none of these logistical issues diminish Zimmer's ideas. His vision of the future of autonomous vehicles seems quite logical and in step with most who work in and watch the space closely. But the speed bump in accepting his vision wholesale is his ambitious self-driving car timeline in general, and for Lyft in particular.
 

A.Mr.Zimmer’s idea is that now we are at the critical moment in history, we should take decisive action whether taking the right path or not.
B.Mr Zimmer thinks the introduction of the autonomous vehicles will not cause the unemployment and surely will increase the employment because such car drivers will be needed to provide service.
C.The author has argued that although there are still some problems in Mr. Zimmer’s predication but the general direction of realizing self-driving cars will be correct.
D.Mr.Zimmer provides some variable factors such as companies profits and leagal procedure problems in order to realize the massive transformation of self-driving cars in such a short of time.

答案:B
解析:
本题考查细节理解。
【关键词】true
【主题句】By 2025, private car ownership will all but end in major U.S. cities," says Zimmer, a prediction that, if it turns out to be true, would mean it would take just eight years for the majority of the human-driven cars on U.S. roads to disappear. Possible? Sure. Likely? Eight years seems like, once again, a bit of wishful thinking on Zimmer's part.
“到2025年,美国的主要城市的私人汽车所有权将会结束,”Zimmer说。对于这个预测,如果事实证明这是真的,那意味着大多数人类驾驶汽车只需要8年的时间会在美国的道路消失。 可能? 当然。可能性有多大? 对Zimmer来说,八年似乎又是一厢情愿的想法。
Remember, it hasn't even been 10 years since the arrival of the iPhone, and as recent events prove, smartphones are still a category that can yield catastrophic results if not done right. And those are just mobile devices, not vehicles entrusted with transporting and protecting human lives.
请记住,自从iPhone诞生至今还没有10年,并且最近的事件证明,如果做得不当,智能手机仍然会产生灾难性结果。况且这些只是移动设备,而不是托运运输和保护人命的车辆。
To be fair, Zimmer's essay does offer some facts and figures in an attempt to back up his positions, but much of it doesn't appear to take into account variables such as the heavily embedded interests of automobile companies still relying on consumer auto sales, as well as the many legal and roadway logistics that will need to be addressed in order to bring about this massive transformation in such a short time. 公平地说,齐默的文章确实提供了一些事实和数据来企图支持自己的立场,但其中大部分似乎没有考虑到诸如汽车公司依然依赖消费者汽车销售的高度嵌入利益等变量,以及为了在如此短的时间内实现这一巨大转变而需要解决的众多法律和道路物流问题。
"Our society is at a fork in the road and whether we take the right path is not inevitable," admits Zimmer. Zimmer承认:“我们的社会正在走向分叉,我们是否走上正确的道路并非不可避免。”
what I do know is that decisive action must be taken by all of us? —? business leaders, policymakers, city planners, and citizens? — ?to realize the full potential of this almost unprecedented moment in history. 我所知道的是,所有商界领袖、政策制定者、城市规划者和公民都必须采取果断行动,以充分发挥这一史无前例的历史时刻的潜力。We believe that in the first five or more years following the introduction of autonomous vehicles,the need for human drivers will actually increase not decrease...我们相信,在推出自动驾驶车辆后的头五年或更长时间内,对人力驾驶的需求实际上将增加而不是减少。
【解析】题目意为“根据文章内容,以下哪项是正确的?”选项A意为“齐默先生认为,现在我们正处于历史的关键时刻,我们应该果断决定是否走这条正确的路。”与原文中“一定要采取果断行动”不符,故错误。选项B意为“齐默先生认为,自动驾驶汽车的引入不会导致失业,而且肯定会增加就业,因为将需要相应的汽车驾驶员提供服务。”选项C意为“作者认为,虽然齐默先生的预测中仍存在一些问题,但实现自动驾驶汽车的总体方向是正确的。”原文中反复提到了自动驾驶汽车的风险和问题,表达作者对实现自动驾车总体方向的隐忧。选项D意为“齐默先生为实现自动驾驶汽车在如此短的时间内的大规模转型提供了一些可借鉴的因素,如公司利润和法律程序问题。”与原文中“似乎没有考虑盈利以及众多法律问题”不符,故错误;根据主题句,只有选项B与题意意思相符合。

更多相关问题