It is implied by the writer that _____.

题目
单选题
It is implied by the writer that _____.
A

it is cheaper to travel by plane than by train

B

the railway station is usually in the suburb of the city

C

when you get off the plane you will find yourself in the center of the city

D

no motorcar or plane can carry as much goods as a train does

如果没有搜索结果或未解决您的问题,请直接 联系老师 获取答案。
相似问题和答案

第1题:

192 Which of the following is associated with a buyer's request for material to meet a particular need:

A. material warranty

B. material guarantees

C. implied warranty of salability

D. implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose

E. A and C only


正确答案:D

第2题:

25. Which of the following is TRUE?

A. The writer never fights with Grace.

B. When Grace has problems in her studies, she asks the teacher.

C. The writer is not as tall as Grace.

D. The teacher doesn’t think the writer is improving in her drawing.


正确答案:C
25.C【解析】从倒数第二段第一句可知c为正确选项.

第3题:

_____ is associated with a buyer's request for materials or equipment to meet a particular need or accomplish a specific purpose.

A Express warranty

B Implied warranty of merchantability

C Implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose

D Prescribed warranty

E None of the above.


正确答案:C

第4题:

14.It’s clear that ________.

A. the writer had never met the woman before

B. the writer often washed the window

C. they both worked as cleaners

D. they lived in a small town


正确答案:A
14.A[解析】由上下文可判断,作者并不认识对面的女人,故选A。

第5题:

An () is something that is implied.

A、implicature

B、Deixis

C、Pragmatics

D、implication


参考答案:A

第6题:

72 _____ is associated with a buyer's request for materials or equipment to meet a particular need or accomplish a specific purpose.

A. Express warranty

B. Implied warranty of merchantability

C. Implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose

D. Prescribed warranty

E. None of the above


正确答案:C

第7题:

In relation to the law of contract, distinguish between and explain the effect of:

(a) a term and a mere representation; (3 marks)

(b) express and implied terms, paying particular regard to the circumstances under which terms may be implied in contracts. (7 marks)


正确答案:

This question requires candidates to consider the law relating to terms in contracts. It specifically requires the candidates to distinguish between terms and mere representations and then to establish the difference between express and implied terms in contracts.
(a) As the parties to a contract will be bound to perform. any promise they have contracted to undertake, it is important to distinguish between such statements that will be considered part of the contract, i.e. terms, and those other pre-contractual statements which are not considered to be part of the contract, i.e. mere representations. The reason for distinguishing between them is that there are different legal remedies available if either statement turns out to be incorrect.
A representation is a statement that induces a contract but does not become a term of the contract. In practice it is sometimes difficult to distinguish between the two, but in attempting to do so the courts will focus on when the statement was made in relation to the eventual contract, the importance of the statement in relation to the contract and whether or not the party making the statement had specialist knowledge on which the other party relied (Oscar Chess v Williams (1957) and Dick
Bentley v Arnold Smith Motors (1965)).
(b) Express terms are statements actually made by one of the parties with the intention that they become part of the contract and
thus binding and enforceable through court action if necessary. It is this intention that distinguishes the contractual term from
the mere representation, which, although it may induce the contractual agreement, does not become a term of the contract.
Failure to comply with the former gives rise to an action for breach of contract, whilst failure to comply with the latter only gives rise to an action for misrepresentation.

Such express statements may be made by word of mouth or in writing as long as they are sufficiently clear for them to be enforceable. Thus in Scammel v Ouston (1941) Ouston had ordered a van from the claimant on the understanding that the balance of the purchase price was to be paid ‘on hire purchase terms over two years’. When Scammel failed to deliver the van Ouston sued for breach of contract without success, the court holding that the supposed terms of the contract were too
uncertain to be enforceable. There was no doubt that Ouston wanted the van on hire purchase but his difficulty was that
Scammel operated a range of hire purchase terms and the precise conditions of his proposed hire purchase agreement were
never sufficiently determined.
Implied terms, however, are not actually stated or expressly included in the contract, but are introduced into the contract by implication. In other words the exact meaning and thus the terms of the contract are inferred from its context. Implied terms can be divided into three types.
Terms implied by statute
In this instance a particular piece of legislation states that certain terms have to be taken as constituting part of an agreement, even where the contractual agreement between the parties is itself silent as to that particular provision. For example, under s.5 of the Partnership Act 1890, every member of an ordinary partnership has the implied power to bind the partnership in a contract within its usual sphere of business. That particular implied power can be removed or reduced by the partnership agreement and any such removal or reduction of authority would be effective as long as the other party was aware of it. Some implied terms, however, are completely prescriptive and cannot be removed.
Terms implied by custom or usage
An agreement may be subject to terms that are customarily found in such contracts within a particular market, trade or locality. Once again this is the case even where it is not actually specified by the parties. For example, in Hutton v Warren (1836), it was held that customary usage permitted a farm tenant to claim an allowance for seed and labour on quitting his tenancy. It should be noted, however, that custom cannot override the express terms of an agreement (Les Affreteurs Reunnis SA v Walford (1919)).
Terms implied by the courts Generally, it is a matter for the parties concerned to decide the terms of a contract, but on occasion the court will presume that the parties intended to include a term which is not expressly stated. They will do so where it is necessary to give business efficacy to the contract.

Whether a term may be implied can be decided on the basis of the officious bystander test. Imagine two parties, A and B, negotiating a contract, when a third party, C, interrupts to suggest a particular provision. A and B reply that that particular term is understood. In just such a way, the court will decide that a term should be implied into a contract.
In The Moorcock (1889), the appellants, owners of a wharf, contracted with the respondents to permit them to discharge their ship at the wharf. It was apparent to both parties that when the tide was out the ship would rest on the riverbed. When the tide was out, the ship sustained damage by settling on a ridge. It was held that there was an implied warranty in the contract that the place of anchorage should be safe for the ship. As a consequence, the ship owner was entitled to damages for breach of that term.
Alternatively the courts will imply certain terms into unspecific contracts where the parties have not reduced the general agreement into specific details. Thus in contracts of employment the courts have asserted the existence of implied terms to impose duties on both employers and employees, although such implied terms can be overridden by express contractual provision to the contrary.

第8题:

Which of the following is associated with a buyer's request for material to meet a particular need:

A material warranty

B material guarantees

C implied warranty of salability

D implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose

E A and C only


正确答案:D

第9题:

Why was the young woman who had lost her wallet invited to dinner?

A.She was familiar with the writer"s aunt.

B.She was familiar with the writer"s uncle.

C.She happened to be invited so as to amount to 4 persons for dinner.

D.She was friend of writer"s uncle and aunt.


正确答案:C
其他选项都是猜测,文中没用表述。

第10题:

To fully understand the writer, we must read not only between the lines but also _______ the lines to know what is implied in the article.

A.among
B.in
C.beyonD
D.for

答案:C
解析:
本题考查介词
C选项,beyond the lines意为“弦外之音”。句意为“为了全面理解作者,我们不仅必须读字里行间的意思,我们还要理解文章暗含的意思”。beyond “超出”,综上,C选项正确。
A选项,among“在……中间”,故排除。
B选项,in“在……里面”,故排除。
D选项,for“为了”,故排除。
故正确答案为C项。

更多相关问题