According to Paragraph 1, Ms. Simmons was criticized for______.A．gaining excessive profitsB．failing to fulfill her dutyC．refusing to make compromisesD．leaving the board in tough times

Why did Ms. Dorn write the letter?

A.To describe her experiences to her family
B.To express her satisfaction with the company
C.To request a specific guide for a future tour
D.To ask a question about the history of Egypt

Her faith upheld her in times of sadness.

A:supported
B:excited
C:inspired
D:directed

According to her letter, what action did Ms. Walter take?

A.She called the company to complain
B.She paid her bills by telephone
C.She emailed her credit card company
D.She sent payments for late fees

Why did Ms. Oguro write an e-mail to Ms. Narazaki? （　　）

A.To offer her a job
B.To compliment her on her new book
C.To invite her to visit Sydney
D.To request advice on writing books

Mary was frustrated by the lack of appreciation shown of her work.

A:puzzled
B:disturbed
C:disappointed
D:criticized

Text 1 Ruth Simmons joined Goldman Sachs's board as an outside director in January 2000;a year later she became president of Brown University.For the rest of the decade she apparently managed both roles without attracting much criticism.But by the end of 2009 Ms.Simmons was under fire for having sat on Goldman's compensation committee;how could she have let those enormous bonus payouts pass unremarked?By February the next year Ms.Simmons had left the board.The position was just taking up too much time,she said.Outside directors are supposed to serve as helpful,yet less biased,advisers on a firm's board.Having made their wealth and their reputations elsewhere,they presumably have enough independence to disagree with the chief executive's proposals.If the sky,and the share price,is falling,outside directors should be able to give advice based on having weathered their own crises.The researchers from Ohio University used a database that covered more than 10，000 firms and more than 64，000 different directors between 1989 and 2004.Then they simply checked which directors stayed from one proxy statement to the next.The most likely reason for departing a board was age,so the researchers concentrated on those“surprise”disappearances by directors under the age of 70.They found that after a surprise departure,the probability that the company will subsequently have to restate earnings increases by nearly 20%.The likelihood of being named in a federal classaction lawsuit also increases,and the stock is likely to perform worse.The effect tended to be larger for larger firms.Although a correlation between them leaving and subsequent bad performance at the firm is suggestive,it does not mean that such directors are always jumping off a sinking ship.Often they“trade up，”leaving riskier,smaller firms for larger and more stable firms.But the researchers believe that outside directors have an easier time of avoiding a blow to their reputations if they leave a firm before bad news break,even if a review of history shows they were on the board at the time any wrongdoing occurred.Firms who want to keep their outside directors through tough times may have to create incentives.Otherwise outside directors will follow the example of Ms.Simmons,once again very popular on campus.
We learn from Paragraph 2 that outside directors are supposed to be_____

A.generous investors
B.unbiased executives
C.share price forecasters
D.independent advisers