评价者按照一定的评价指标体系，对自己的情况进行自我评价，以达到相应的评价目的，这种评价属于（）。

Passage 2It's no surprise that Jennifer Senior's insightful, provocative magazine cover story,I love My Children,I Hate My Life, is arousing much chatter-nothing gets people talking like the suggestion that child rearing is anything less than a completely fulfilling, life-enriching experience. Rather than concluding that children make parents either happy or miserable, Senior suggests we need to redefine happiness: instead of thinking of it as something that can be measured by moment-to-moment joy, we should consider being happy as a past-tense condition. Even though the day-to-day experience of raising kids can be soul-crushingly hard, Senior writes that the very things that in the moment dampen our moods can later be sources of intense gratification and delight.The magazine cover showing an attractive mother holding a cute baby is hardly the only Madonna-and-child image on newsstands this week. There are also stories about newly adoptive-and newly single-mom Sandra Bullock, as well as the usual Jennifer Aniston is pregnant news. Practically every week features at least one celebrity mom, or mom-to-be, smiling on the newsstands.In a society that so persistently celebrates procreation, is it any wonder that admitting you regret having children is equivalent to admitting you support kitten-killing? It doesn't seem quite fair, then, to compare the regrets of parents to the regrets of the childless. Unhappy parents rarely are provoked to wonder if they shouldn't have had kids, but unhappy childless folks are bothered with the message that children are the single most important thing in the world: obviously their misery must be a direct result of the gaping baby-size holes in their lives.Of course, the image of parenthood that celebrity magazines like Us Weekly and People present is hugely unrealistic, especially when the parents are single mothers like Bullock. According to several studies concluding that parents are less happy than childless couples, single parents are the least happy of all. No shock there, considering how much work it is to raise a kid without a partner to lean on; yet to hear Sandra and Britney tell it, raising a kid on their own(read: with round-the-clock help) is a piece of cake.It's hard to imagine that many people are dumb enough to want children just because Reese and Angelina make it look so glamorous: most adults understand that a baby is not a haircut. But it's interesting to wonder if the images we see every week of stress-free, happiness-enhancing parenthood aren't in some small, subconscious way contributing to our own dissatisfactions with the  actual experience, in the same way that a small part of us hoped getting the Rachel might make us look just a little bit like Jennifer Aniston.According to Paragraph 4, the message conveyed by celebrity magazines is________.

1840年以来，中国在经济近代化的道路上，经历了一个从被迫开放到主动融入世界的发展过程。以下史实表述正确的是（）

依据教学目标设计本篇课文的教学过程，简要说明每个环节的教学内容与教学方式。

俗话说，“不打不相识”“不入虎穴、焉得虎子”。下列选项和这两句俗语反映的道理相同的是（）。 ①“汗滴禾下土”才知“粒粒皆辛苦” ②尝百草，才有“神医”李时珍 ③“纸上得来终觉浅，绝知此事要躬行” ④认识是在变革对象的实践过程中产生的

简述影响文化发展的重要因素

“与中国的大同社会、陶渊明的桃花源、柏拉图的理想国等相类似„„它是一种批判现实的思想力量，是人们的理想寄托，有助于推动人们改变现实不合理的社会”。这种描述最有可能是（）

简述布置历史作业时需要遵循的原则。

关于基因突变是否可以遗传，有下列说法，其中不正确的是（）。

阅读下列材料和具体要求，回答后面的问题。    《沁园春，长沙》是人教版高中语文必修(1)第一单元第一篇。这首词通过对长沙秋景的描绘和对青年时代革命斗争生活的回忆，抒写出革命青年对国家命运的感慨和以天下为己任、蔑视反动统治者、改造旧中国的豪情壮志。本课的教学目标是通过品味意象，感悟词中阔大的意境，领会诗人主宰大地浮沉的宽广胸襟和革命气概。教师为这首词的教学设计一则导语：    我们以前已经学习过毛泽东的词作《沁园春·雪》，请同学们和老师一起来背诵。（播放有关秋风、秋叶飘落的画面）你看到里面的景象，感受如何呢？（让学生各抒己见：萧条、冷清、凄凉……）你会联想到有关“秋”的哪些诗句呢？（调动学生的积累，如杜甫的“无边落木萧萧下，不尽长江滚滚来”，马致远的“枯藤老树昏鸦”刘禹锡的“自古逢秋悲寂寥”……）可见，大家知识面很广，联想的诗句很多。（激励肯定学生）从这些诗句中我们可以看出古代文人常常把“秋”与“悲”“愁”联系在一起。那我们来看一下，毛泽东笔下的秋景是怎样的？又展现了他怎样的情怀？让我们一起赏析毛泽东的词——《沁园春·长沙》。    对上述案例的分析，不正确的一项是(  )。

Passage2An article in Scientific America has pointed out that empirical research says that，actually，you think you're more beautiful than you are.We have a deep-seated need to feel good about ourselves and we naturally employ a number of self-enhancing strategies to achieve this.Social psychologists have amassed oceans of research into what they call theabove average effect”or“illusory superiority, and shown that, for example,70% of us rate ourselves as above average in leadership,93% in driving and 85% at getting on well with others-all obviously statistical impossibilities.We rose-tint our memories and put ourselves into self-affirming situations. We become defensive when criticized, and apply negative stereotypes to others to boost our own esteem. We stalk around thinking we' re hot stuf.Psychologist and behavioral scientist Nicholas Epley oversaw a key study into self-enhancement and attractiveness. Rather than have people simply rate their beauty compared with others, he asked them to identify an original photograph of themselves from a lineup including versions that had been altered to appear more and less attractive. Visual recognition, reads the study, isan automatic psychological process, occurring rapidly and intuitively with little or no apparent conscious deliberation.If the subjects quickly chose a falsely flattering image-which most did-they genuinely believed it was really how they looked.Epley found no significant gender difference in responses. Nor was there any evidence that those who self-enhanced the most(that is, the participants who thought the most positively doctored pictures were real) were doing so to make up for profound insecurities. In fact, those who thought that the images higher up the attractiveness scale were real directly corresponded with those who showed other markers for having higher self-esteem.I don't think the findings that we have are any evidence of personal delusion,says Epley.It's a reflection simply of people generally thinking well of themselves.If you are depressed, you won't be self-enhancing.Knowing the results of Epley's study, it makes sense that many people hate photographs of themselves yiscerally-on one level, they don't even recognize the person in the picture as themselves. Facebook, therefore, is a self-enhancer's paradise, where people can share only the most flattering photos, the cream of their wit, style, beauty, intellect and lifestyles.It's not that people's profiles are dishonest,says Catalina Toma of Wisconsin-Madison University,but they portray an idealized version of themselves.According to the first paragraph, social psychologists have found that .